Tags
Age (6) Apprenticeships (1) Belief (4) Bristish Values (1) British Values (23) Community cohesion (6) Confidentiality aggreements (1) Conflict (1) Corona virus (1) CPD (1) culture (1) data (2) Disability (35) Discrimination (27) diversity (1) Education (4) EHRC (1) EHRC/GEO (19) Employment (60) Equality (10) Equality Act (1) Equality Act 2010 (32) Equality and Diversity (3) Equality Objectives (3) Ethnicity (7) Freedom of speech (3) Gender (33) gender fluid (1) Gender identity (4) gender pay gap (8) Gender reassignment (11) Gender reassignment. trans equality (4) Good relations (6) Gypsy (1) Gypsy Roma Traveller (3) Harassment (17) Hate crime (6) Human rights (15) immigration (2) Inclusion (1) inspection (6) Intersectional approaches (1) Intolerance (1) Islam (1) J K Rowling (1) leadership and management (1) learners (1) Legal duties (24) Legislation (5) LGBT (1) Maternity (11) Mental Health (13) Migrants (4) Neurodiverse (2) non-binary (1) Ofsted (32) Paternity (1) Police (1) positive action (2) positive discrimination (1) Poverty (3) Pregnancy (11) Prejudice (6) Prevent (9) Protected characteristics (1) PSED (2) Public Sector Equality Duty (4) Race (12) reasonable adjustments (1) Recruitment (2) Refugees (4) Religion (14) religion and belief (7) Risk Assessment (1) Roma and Traveller students (1) RReligion (1) Safeguarding (5) Sexual orientation (25) social distancing (1) Social exclusion (1) socioeconomic (2) SStaff development (1) Staff development (4) Stress (2) teaching and learning (3) Training (6) trans equality (20) Unconscious Bias (7) Vegan (1) Violence (1) Volunteers (1) Weight (2) Well-being (2) Well-being Corona virus (1) workplace learning (3)

Delegates at a training session being run by Christine Rose

Training

Want to find out what makes Christine's training events different? visit training >

Consultancy

Interested in how Christine can help your organisation improve? visit consultancy >

Delegates attending a professional conference

Events

Want to find out when Christine is speaking at an event near you? visit events >

E&D news updates

Get the latest news by email. Sign up to consent to receive Christine's free newsletter

« Dates for your diaries | Main | Shared parental leave changes come into effect next month. Are you ready? »
Saturday
Mar212015

Is obesity a disability?

Would your staff make inappropriate comments about a colleague’s weight? Do you know that such comments could constitute disability harassment?  

The definition of a disabled person is broad and includes people with mobility or sensory impairments, long term medical conditions, specific learning difficulties, mental health difficulties and neurodiverse conditions such as ADHD and Aspergers. But a recent judgement might mean that obesity could be included in this list. 

A UK employment tribunal has become the first to consider obesity as a disability following last year’s ruling in the European Court of Justice. In the case of Bickerstaff v Butcherthe court unanimously decided that the claimant is disabled and upheld his claim of harassment. 

Mr Bickerstaff frequently experienced harassment colleagues because of his weight. For example, on one occasion a work colleague has said that Mr Bickerstaff was ‘so fat he could hardly walk’ and on another occasion ‘so fat he would hardly feel a knife being stuck into him’. 

The tribunal referred to a ruling in December in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) where a Danish childminder claimed he was sacked for being too fat. The ECJ said that if obesity hinders ‘full and effective participation’ at work, it could count as a disability. 

The employment judge said it was satisfied that Mr Butcher had been ‘harassed for a reason which related to his disability, namely his morbid obesity condition’. It heard evidence of the claimant’s sleep apnoea and gout because of large body mass index (48.5). 

This judgment also notable that medical report stated that Mr Butcher’s health would improve if he lost weight. But the tribunal pointed out that this made no difference to their decision. That the claimant’s condition was self-inflicted and could have been improved was irrelevant - the important thing for the tribunal to focus on was the impact of the condition on the worker, not its cause.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.